If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable but they can still cause issues for users.
https://sheetforce34.bravejournal.net/post/2023/04/07/What-lengths-Can-You-Proceed-Coming-from-a-5G-Mobile-phone-Tower-Without-Being-Unsafe determine the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. http://hourowner47.xtgem.com/__xt_blog/__xtblog_entry/__xtblog_entry/33550711-how-far-away-from-some-sort-of-5g-mobile-structure-is-safe?__xtblog_block_id=1#xt_blog are based on research which show that the energy of RF can be harmful to health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy that is absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and cataracts, and skin cancer.
Due to the potential for harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged across 1 centimeter, and not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you're probably aware that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the farther you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good however, those living close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had significant more health issues than those who lived farther distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ of the human body and is responsible for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on a variety of assumptions that aren't supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues).
The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect on the body of short bursts generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure guidelines.
Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum limit of exposure to the local SARs, based on the maximum frequency of absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. safe distance to live from cell phone tower of RF radiation with other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This can lead to the risk of having adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.